5/31/2023 0 Comments Americas lost masterpieceIt wasn’t just that the arguments were unsuccessful. They saw the problem in the oral argument. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his appeal.Īs the case developed, however, it became clear that, while the justices were sympathetic to Phillips, there was no coherent First Amendment theory by which he could win. Phillips claimed, unsuccessfully, that he was protected by freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Craig and Mullins then filed a civil rights complaint against Phillips for violating Colorado’s antidiscrimination statute. They left immediately without discussing any details of their proposed wedding cake. When the owner, Jack Phillips, greeted them, they told him (according to his own testimony) that they “wanted a wedding cake for ‘our wedding.’” Phillips told them that he did not create wedding cakes for same-sex weddings. Charlie Craig and David Mullins visited the Masterpiece bakery and looked through a photo album of custom-designed cakes. Colorado Civil Rights Commission are simple. The Court's opinion provides no tangible help for the baker or other religious objectors to antidiscrimination laws, though it offers them some important moral encouragement. He did get the decision against him reversed, but the next time he turns away a same-sex couple (as he has said he will do), he will lose his case. That is technically accurate but deeply misleading. The press is reporting that the Christian baker who refused to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding has won his case in the Supreme Court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |